The Men In Black!

Nick Redfern's book about those mysterious men in black is about to appear (in June).

Click here for some pre-arrival information

UFOs without culture? Why?

Anthony Lane‘s review of Werner Herzog’s “Cave of Forgotten Dreams” [New Yorker, May 2nd, 2011, Page 88 ff.] abutted, for this writer, a paper, discovered among others, entitled Speculations on the First Contact: Encyclopedia Galactica or the Music of the Spheres? by Guillermo A. Lemarchand of the Instituto Angentino de Radioastronomia [CONICET], Buenos Aires.



The movie review (by Lane) deals with how director Herzog presents his vision of the cave drawings on a wall in the Chauvet-Pont d’Arc, in the Ardèche reagion of France.







The Chauvet-Pont wall of drawings, from about thirty-five to thirty-eight thousand years ago, is more “cinematic” (says Herzog) than those at Lascaux, and should be compared with the shapes found at Swabia, four hundred miles away.









Lemarchand’s account of a Seminar on the Cultural Impact of Extraterrestrial Contact (sponsored by the Foundation for the Future) addressed the hypothesis that an extraterrestrial civilization worthy of contact would be much in advance of Earth, technologically, but that wouldn’t be the best premise for contact.

Lemarchand writes that mankind here has provided an advanced form of culture as represented by the art found in caves, such as Lascaux or Chauvet-Pont, and an alien civilization would have a similar esthetic culture, which any civilization of long-standing would have since they didn’t wipe themselves out with wars or cataclysmic accidents.

Lemarchand also thinks an alien culture/civilization would have a moral or ethical stance, not unlike that of the philosopher Immanuel Kant (but that’s not my point here).



Lemarchand’s paper dismisses the idea that the best way to contact alien civilizations is not by mathematics or technical formulae. Such abstract devices would not be as developed as would art (or music), which would, if the alien culture is extant, have evolved much in the way that Earth’s art (and music) has evolved, from the art of the cave(s) to what it is today. (Although I think that art has devolved from that of the caves, but that’s a matter for another time and discussion.)

Earthlings, writes Lemarchand (from ideas of Carl Sagan), are members of a Technologically Adolescent Society. Thus, communicating with a more advanced alien society would then be problematical, as we’d have a difficult time understanding advanced technological information, whereas understanding an artistic image of an alien culture would not be difficult.

Lemarchand points out that there are several patterns in art and nature that can be considered as universal as mathematics in interstellar communication attempts” (von Hoerner, 1974; Lemarchand and Lomberg, 1996).

And using artistic symbols would be a better mechanism for an interstellar communication than SETI’s mathematical approach, which is what Sagan was striving for with his golden disk attached to the Voyager spacecraft(s).



Lemarchand’s paper is rife with intellectual insights about alien communication, humanity, the arts, and science. (I can’t provide a link as the paper was found among others here, and has no provenance, although I imagine it was printed out from our Sage Publications account a few years ago. Interested parties might seek it out via Google.)

Now let me get to the point from which I have egregiously digressed….

And this point has been made before, earlier at this blog and elsewhere in our internet outings.

Nowhere has art or music been noted on (or from) UFOs.

Yes, there have been symbols or insigniae, as mentioned in the post preceding this one, but those have not been artistic or esthetic, as the drawings on the wall caves, or other human pictorials are.



No UFO or flying saucer reports have identified music as endemic to the sightings. And no art, aside from those militaristic or corporate-like insignia/symbols, has been registered – none like that which Lemarchand thinks would be intrinsic to an advanced extraterrestrial race.

What does this tell us about UFOs? That whatever they are, or whomever “mans” them, are either not advanced in a way that would include moral imperatives (as Lemarchand articulates) nor are they as advanced in even a small way as that of the Neanderthals or early man was, as indicated by the art in the caves of Lascaux and Chauvet-Pont d’Arc.

This means, for us, that UFOs are either created by Earthlings or are artifacts without a cultural or living species origination – a physical manifestation of some kind -- or UFOs belong to a race or races that are without moral imperatives (ethics) and refinements which would ameliorate contact between us and them as (we hate to note) some abduction accounts seem to warn.

I’ve gone far afield here, and have departed from any cogent hypothesis. But I’m hopeful that some readers might comprehend that UFOs present alternatives to thought besides the usual cavil that permeates discussions here and all over the UFO community.

And that a civilized discourse might take us into new directions, away from the classic, banal UFO cases that usurp innovative energies and keep us mired in obsequious back-and-forths which lead nowhere and have for a long time now.

We can hope….

Real Contactees?

A man, Wilbur J Wilkinson, provided this script, claiming it was from a race using the moon as a way-station for its people from the planet Maser.:



Here’s the almost unknown story as recounted by Jerome Clark in one of his books:

Hunrath and Wilkinson account

In the script above, nothing registers, except the word Enlil, which represents, in Sumerian “theology” the Lord of the Air and Lord of the Command (whose mother was Ki).

Yes, the story is goofy on the face of it, but the disappearance of the two men, like the mysterious disappearance of pilot Fredrick Valentich, is intriguing.

Valentich YouTube video

The contactee stories, while mostly fictional, should not be dismissed out of hand.

There may be a truth or a reality inside them, somewhere….

The Mystery of Aliens

Ancient Astronaut theorists posit the idea that the messengers and gods of old were extraterrestrial visitors, which is not necessarily a faulty supposition, considering the circumstantial “evidence” presented to bolster the hypothesis.



The visitors were not gray with large, almond-shaped eyes as they are rendered today by descriptives.



In mythology and religious-oriented works, the visitors of old were manifested by an aura that bespoke something otherworldly but not grotesque.



Those visitors often mated with human beings, as recounted in the Genesis account of the Hebrew Bible [6:1]:

...The sons of God saw that the daughters of man were good, and they took themselves wives from whomever they chose. God said, ’My spirit will not continue to judge man forever, since he is nothing but flesh. His days shall be 120 years’. The Nephilim were on the earth in those days and also later. The sons of God had come to the daughters of man and had fathered them. They were the mightiest ones who ever existed, men of renown.



And they also appear in the Greek myths, as Gods, whose dalliances produced such Greek Heroes as Achilles and Heracles.



And Merlin, the great wizard of the Arthurian legends, was said to have been fathered by an Incubus. [Bulfinch]



In the 1950s, flying saucer “occupants’ – as reported by observers – were usually grotesque or small, bizarre creatures, akin to the little people folklore of the British Isles.



In the 1960s, those visitors morphed into the so-called “grays” which evolved out of the Betty and Barney Hill abduction saga.



There is a dispute, extant, about what Betty Hill really described, at first, about her “abductors” – mostly having to do with their noses. But the “creatures” she allegedly encountered eventually came into being as the ubiquitous UFO people pictured when UFO occupants are discussed:



The question posed is this…

What happened between 5,000 years ago when the Sumerians pictured their “gods” and the modern era when UFO beings are described? [Intelligent Life in the Universe, Shklovskii/Sagan, Delta, 1966]



That is, why has the intruders’ physiognomy changed?

Yes, we accept the reality behind the myths and Biblical renditions of gods (or messengers from above).

We also think that some relatively recent observations of creatures nearby, what some call, UFOs or, better, flying saucers, are true also, whether created as an illusion or actually as perceived.



(The alien abduction phenomenon, which remains controversial and not proven, has been, in one form or another, around since the beginning of oral and written history, as anyone familiar with mythology and religious texts knows.)

There is a mystery in all this, one that is connected in all its aspects by the similarities in the visitations.

The difference lies in how the “visitors” appeared, not in how they acted, but what they looked like.



Are there, or were there, two different classes of beings – some actually gods (or imagined as such) and some actually extraterrestrials (or imagined as such)?

It’s a mystery, either way…..

(And yes, we’ve covered this before, in 2007)

ETI: The Search

A paper, for our British friends, is How Should We Really Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence? By Dr. Colin Ridyard

The paper is a brief overview of techniques for ET searching, as its title suggests.

A few interesting ET events from 1957 are presented and a look at Rendlesham too.



SETI is covered, of course, also.

Click here to read the PDF

Close Encounters Conference

Philip Mantle's UFO Matrix magazine is presenting a Close Encounters conference in October 2011.

Click here for the full announcement

A UFO creature report (and the Templeton "spaceman")

As an habitue of Huntsville, Canada, this account of a UFO and its attendant “creature” resonates with me.



Robert Suffern (28 years old at the time), with his family, saw a UFO that disembarked a creature.

Mr. Suffern had received a call form his sister who thought she saw a barn on fire. Robert went to check it out and ended up seeing a UFO and a creature.

The UFO was described thusly:

Then I saw the ship in the centre of the road. It was the colour of the dull side of aluminum foil wrap and the surface was irregular and crinkled. I could not hear any sound other than the motor of my car. I only saw it momentarily and then it went straight up at a fast speed and disappeared. There were no lights.



And then he saw a creature, and described it this way:

...I started for home, turned onto the Three Mile Lake Road and then I saw the thing on the side of the road. He was on the grass shoulder of the road and was about to cross from myright to my left. It suddenly pivoted and turned towards the pasture and vaulted over the fence and out of sight. It appeared to be short and had very broad shoulders which seemed to be out of proportion. The movements were similar to an ape or a midget, but it was very agile. It reached up with its hands, grabbed the fence, post and vaulted over with no effort. The head portion was covered in a globe and I could not detect any mask or face portion. The suit was a silver colour and one piece—the globe was a contrasting white or light colour.



What’s fascinating to me is how similar the drawing of the Utterson creature is to the Solway Firth “spaceman.”

Setting aside the estimated, disparate height of Suffern’s creature, note the stance in the drawing, which didn’t derive from Mr. Suffern as far as I can tell, but whomever provided the drawing or suggestions for the drawing either had access to the Templeton photo of 1965 or received a description that surely mimics the Solway Firth being.

Even without a Solway Firth connection, this sighting is interesting, and Richard Hall also found it so:

“October 7, 1975 Utterson, Ontario, Canada 8:30 P.M. One small, stocky humanoid, round helmet, from metallic ellipse on road; UFO took off as car approached, being beside road vaulted fence and fled.” [From Mr. Hall’s category of humanoid creature reports.]

Such creature sightings do not happen nowadays, and that’s something which should be addressed by “ufologists.”

Adventures of an Earthling

Noted documentary filmmaker Mishara Canino-Hussung and her equally noted filmmaker husband Bill Hussung have produced “Adventures of an Earthling” – an investigation and film about some strange sightings that occurred in the Hudson Valley area by residents there in the early 1990s, one of whom is Bill Hussing’s mother.

Skeptical Bill Hussung, while wary of the encounters delineated by his mother and others, including a sighting of a giant space ship, does what any respectful son would do: treat the stories as authentic. After all, why would his mother, a smart, successful woman in her own right, make up such a story. And, he asks, why would she seem so terrified when she recounted the sighting(s)?

To read more about this intriguing tale and other UFO encounters and to get a DVD of Ms. Canino-Hussung’s quite wonderful “documentary,” visit the Boom Potato Films web-site:

http://boompotatofilms.com

From what we’ve seen, the encounters that Bill Hussung’s mother recounts can’t be dismissed out of hand. We’ll be checking further into the sightings.

The Word of God: Extraterrestrials Are Real by Anthony Bragalia

We do not read the Scriptures the way that they are- we read them the way that we are. Our interpretations and bias can turn biblical verse into support for just about any position. But is there clear and explicit mention in the Bible of physical, intelligent life beyond Earth? Does the Book of Books confirm the existence of the Extraterrestrial?

THE BIBLE AS A SOURCE OF ET INFORMATION

The Bible means different things to different people. To some it is literally the Word of God. For others it is an historical recording of philosophical and spiritual beliefs. It helps to provide insight into a younger mankind's values, tenets, viewpoints and principles. It is on this point that perhaps we can all find agreement. In reading it we gain an understanding about those who have come before us and how they reflected on life's larger questions: Where do we come from? Why are we here? What is to become of us?

But are there hints in the Holy Book that address whether or not we are alone in the Universe? Does the "Good News" proclaim that there are people on other planets? For many, God represents the unfolding of possibility. Did he realize the possibility of intelligent life on other celestial bodies? I went to the source and read the Bible to find out. I was surprised at what was discovered, as you may soon be:

THE VERSES PROCLAIM: LIFE IS UNIVERSAL



Tales that are told in the Bible of "Ezekiel's Wheel" or of the "Nephilim" (or even of the Star of Bethlehem) have been taken by some researchers to be "evidence" of "flying saucers" or extraterrestrials in ancient times. But these interpretations are just that- opinions. And they are complex and sometimes convoluted scenarios. The ancient Bible-writers could be referring to such things, or they could be referring to images and meanings that have nothing at all to do with UFOs and aliens.

But there are in fact far more precise and direct allusions to ET to be found within the Bible. These are not so subject to interpretation. They elucidate rather clearly the belief that we share the Universe with other physical creatures. These verses are not taken out of context nor are they examples of "selective cherry-picking." And whether or not they are genuinely inspired by God, these Scriptures make clear that early Judeo-Christian man considered it divine truth that there are others that dwell on other celestial bodies.

This unambiguous belief is especially borne out in four rather striking verses found within the Scriptures:

"There are also celestial bodies and bodies terrestrial; and the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial another." [Corinthians 15:40]

If we replace "celestial bodies" with "extraterrestrial" (which is what they are) the verse becomes even more stunning:

"...the glory of the extraterrestrial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial another." In the Corinthians verse the distinction is clearly made between "the glory" that exists here on our Earth and "the glory" that exists on other celestial bodies. One type of glorious life is found here on Terra and yet other types of glorious life are to be found on other planets. "Glory" means great beauty and bounty. There would surely be no "glory" shown in God's handiwork if all of the other celestial bodies in the Universe are dead. This verse suggests that God's creation is not lifeless beyond Earth. Creation is a vital creation and reflects the vitality of its Creator. This point is made more explicitly here:

"Lord alone thou hast made the heavens -the heaven of heavens- with all of their starry hosts, and the Earth and all things that are therein." [Nehemiah 9:6]

This line from the Bible is extraordinary. It distinctly mentions all of the "starry hosts" that are to be found in the cosmos. The heaven's Starry Hosts is a profound phrase. One can only "host" things that are animate or alive. "Hosts" have guests. Just as we are "guests" of our host Earth, the Bible is instructing here that the stars throughout the Universe accommodate. The planets have those who rely on them for sustenance. This verse tells us that there are Planetary Hosts. In Genesis 2:1 we hear this same sentiment: "Thus the heavens and Earth were finished, and all the heavenly hosts thereof." Again we see the distinction made between our host (the Earth) and the host planets that exist beyond the Earth.

These ancient recorders of Scripture are referring to physical star systems and celestial bodies that play host to the glory of life. They are not being poetic and they are not referring to "spiritual" or "ethereal" hosts. Nor are they referring to "angelic kingdoms." Rather they are plainly speaking about other planets within the Universe that harbor and sustain life.

Jesus himself is said to have made this point even more succinctly:

"In my Father's house there are many mansions." [John 14:2]

Jesus then explains that this is a profound truth: "If it were not so, I would have told you." Here Jesus affirms that in his Father's house (or the Universe, where God has made all things) there are many dwelling places. And these dwelling places are magnificent (like mansions) - just as Earth is our glorious home. Interestingly, it is this very Bible verse which was repeated over and over again by a dying Reverend Elijiah H. Hankerson, the Base Chaplain at Roswell Army Air Field in 1947, believed to have been involved in the aftermath of the UFO crash (see archived article on this site.)

"(God) stretches out the heavens like a curtain and spreads them out like a tent to dwell in." [Isaiah 40:22]

This biblical revelation is remarkable for two reasons:

We learn that these holy scribes believed that the Creator made dwelling places throughout the Universe. And like the proverbial "big tent"- this creation is all-encompassing, accommodating all walks of life everywhere. But even more telling: Here the Bible clearly mentions the heavens as being "stretched out" like an unfolding curtain. This is a very direct reference to what we now know is fast-becoming scientific truth: The Universe in continually expanding. As the verse reveals, God is "stretching" the Universe and he is "spreading it out." And he has made many places for the many creatures of his creation.

THE AMAZING MESSAGE TO MANKIND: YOU ARE KIN TO THE STARS



The ancient writers of the Good Book instruct us that God has created countless "Starry Hosts" to sustain life. He has prepared many "Tents to Dwell In" across the cosmos. He has shown his "glory" on other planets as he has on Earth. He continues to unfold possibility by "stretching out the heavens" and expanding the Universe. As some of us soon celebrate the birth of The Son of God, we should reflect on his sagacity when he tells us that His Father has indeed built "Many Mansions."

Jenny Randle's segment about the Cumberland Spaceman and Woomera sighting of 1964 on BBC-TV's "Secrets of the Paranormal"

Jenny Randles is one the few bona fide UFO researchers in the world. Here is her investigation of the Templeton Solway Firth (Cumberland) "spaceman" photo and concomitant Woomera (Australia) sighting of a similar being.

(Nick Pope is interviewed also.)


Disclose.tv - the cumberland spaceman 1964 Video

Why You Can't Handle It: The Human Response to Meeting ET by Anthony Bragalia

Copyright 2010, InterAmerica, Inc.



Both here and abroad there is a rising swell of hostility toward immigrants. This mounting negativity towards "those from somewhere else" threatens to shake the very foundations of a multicultural society. We even call immigrants "aliens." But what if the immigrants were "real" aliens? How would you act towards someone who is not from another country- but from another planet? Someone not just of a different skin color- but whose outward appearance is wholly unfamiliar to you? Can we possibly forecast the human response to meeting ET? In so doing, do we also provide ourselves with the answer to the ever-pressing question of why the extraterrestrial has not made open contact with us?

HOW WOULD YOU DEAL WITH IT?

Others have examined the potential impact that open contact with aliens would have on science, economics, religion, politics and similar institutions. What is of greater interest here is how the individual would behave and respond. How would you personally "handle" your interaction with the alien? It would likely impact your innermost self, your essential nature. Might it have other unforeseen consequences?

Would it bring out a deep-seated fear of foreigners, strangers and of the unknown that you did not know that you even had? Would it evoke feelings of inadequacy or diminish your sense of worth and importance as a human being?

APPEARANCE IS EVERYTHING



If you were to encounter a living, breathing entity like those pictured above, your immediate reaction would likely be one of mild revulsion. Imagine if its appearance were even stranger to you? Though the alien can likely appear as it wishes, its "true" inherent appearance is not human. They may be humanoid or be able to disguise themselves as human. They may even be "future humans." But they most assuredly will not be identical to us. For a society increasingly concerned with "looks" and with "first impressions" - the visiting alien would be at a distinct disadvantage from the outset.

When we view the grossly overweight or anorexic, we are repelled. When we see the deformed, we stare. You would scarcely know what to say or how to act to a pygmy suddenly seated in your suburban living room. An encounter with a sentient being who may appear utterly unlike you in very fundamental ways may bring out very fundamental fears and anxieties. Many people may simply not have the ability within their psyche to interact and communicate with a creature wholly out of range of their experience. How would one feel in front of a sentient and conversant creature whose size, bodily proportions, features and coloring are not even Homo sapien? Some would recoil. Others would be unable to focus to talk. All would be initially shocked or "jarred" - and few would be able to get over it.

Conversely, we may find the visiting alien to be stunningly attractive. Perhaps more attractive than other humans. And this too would bring troubles. It may bring about feelings of inadequacy ("I am nothing compared to them") or of unhealthy obsession, envy or jealousy. We have all said stupid or incoherent things because we are overwhelmed by another's appearance. Mankind would be "overwhelmed" by the alien's appearance - whether we found it aesthetically pleasing or hideously revolting.

And it is vital to understand: Humans have only ever had conversation with other humans. It is all we have ever known. Our very frame of reference on this would have to shift. It would be disorienting in the extreme to intelligently converse with a physical being who is non-human. I do not think that most people could ever become accustomed to even holding an intelligent dialog with familiar creatures. Few for instance could handle talking with an upright Grizzly or with a Camel. Few still could handle speaking with creatures who are not even from Earth.

If the visiting alien's image (especially its facial features) and its countenance, carriage, mannerisms and dress were unpleasing to us or markedly different from our own- many of our own would reject it. Though some would be awed by their appearance, many would abhor it. They would experience angst, distress -and even uncontrollable aversion- based simply on looks alone. And this physical dissonance would be compounded if we were to view and interact with people who do not look like us and who are non-emotional (or who express emotion in ways in which we are unfamiliar.) Humans of course express their emotions on their faces.

NATIONALISM, ETHNIC IDENTITY, AND THE ALIEN



A "real" alien would be the Ultimate Immigrant. He would be viewed as not only "not from our country" - but not even from our own world. "Nationalism" is endemic to all countries today. It is an engrained ideological apparatus where citizens and the nation-state find common loyalties and identification. We have all cultivated a devotion to the interests and culture of the respective nations in which we live. "Ethnic Identity" is our shared heritage. It can be based on such things as ancestry, traditions, language or territory.

Both of these powerful concepts - nationalism and ethnic identity - contribute to our sense of belonging. But the alien does not "belong." The alien does not fit any of our people's sense of nationalism or of ethnic identity. The alien would not "fit in" to any existing professional, social, racial, legal, class or caste system. In fact it may well be that they do not share anything with us with which we are familiar. They would be distrusted. Many would find it difficult to cultivate a sense of kinship with them. How would you act towards a "stateless" person who does not have a past, an identity or any "ways of being" with which you can relate?

Nationalism and ethnic identity can lead to a "healthy pride." But unchecked it can also lead to a negative view of other cultures. It can promote an "Us versus Them" attitude which would not welcome the visiting alien. One could envision the uprising of a "One Earth, One People" movement in the wake of the visiting alien.

WE'RE NOT THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING ANYMORE



Medieval society actively resisted the notion that the Earth was round and that it revolved around the Sun. They even killed over it. Though today we universally accept this reality, we still somehow believe that Man is the Center of Everything. We believe that Man exists unchallenged- that he has dominion over his world and its creatures.

What if we were suddenly forced into a new "Copernican Revolution?" Many would indeed "revolt" if they were to become aware of Others in the Universe who are far beyond in time and technology. We would be forced to realize and accept that we share the world. Some of us could not "adjust" to this massive paradigm shift. We would have to come to terms with the fact that we are not uniquely intelligent. It is a "model" which could not be handled by many.

T.S. Eliot once noted that "humankind cannot bear very much reality." And so too it would be if we were made aware of the alien reality by actually meeting them. We would then realize that we are not the Center of Everything anymore. Many simply could not bear it.

And it could have even deeper adverse repercussions. Many would no doubt suffer from "future shock." Future shock is a condition of physical distress and psychological disorientation which is brought on by the inability to cope with rapid or sudden change. Acknowledgement of the alien would necessarily mean that we must also acknowledge that there are those who are older than humankind, who are smarter and wiser than us, and who are more highly advanced on every technical level. They have already "been there and done that." They are "better" than us. Our history is small and insignificant compared to theirs.

Would that hamper our drive to discover and innovate on our own? Would we then individually and collectively question or minimize our very value and worth in the Universe? What would it be like to be ever the student and never the teacher?

And even if they were shown to be non-malevolent, we would continually question the alien's "intentions." It would create an underlying sense of anxiety and concern. Knowing that they know more than us would be a sense of eternal frustration. If their technology is not shared, that sense of anxiety and suspicion would be intensified.

WHY THEY DON'T MAKE OPEN CONTACT: XENOPHOBIA



In ancient times as well as in primitive tribal states, the "foreigner" was viewed as an outlaw, enemy or criminal. Even today there is that same subtle sense that is instilled in many of us. We humans seem forever compelled to draw division. We need to box and label "them" in order to deal with "them." We often blame them. Over the centuries the Irish, Jews, Italians, Black and Latinos have all taken their turns on the bigotry hot-seat. The visiting alien would surely be next in line.

As humans, we seek comfort. And the visiting alien takes us out far out of our comfort zone. The fear of moving toward something that is not known is inherent in most all of us. If someone does not know the other person's culture, religion or race- prejudice emerges. And this prejudice stems from the fear of how such exposure might change ourselves. We would be frightened of the huge change that the visiting alien would represent.

The Alien recognizes that the Human is historically unable to get along with other humans of other races, creeds, colors and countries. They see that we even find it difficult to deal with those of a different age group, gender or sexual identity. They see how we avoid those with physical or mental challenge. We build up inaccurate or even hateful mental images of those things to which we are not exposed, about those who are not like us. Sometimes we even demonize them.

Until we are proven able to "get along" as a human race, non-human races will not make open contact with us. They see that humans still cannot even understand each other- and that for that reason we would be entirely unable to understand the visiting alien. We are still dealing with the tremendous challenge of being human. We are not ready for non-humans. Until we change our inner selves, our outer world will forever be in conflict.

Until this personal transformation, Man will remain apart from the diversity and full splendor that is the Universe. The alien knows that man cannot handle his own society. And because of this, Man's invitation to celestial society is still a long way away.